I need a 4 page research evaluation on the controversy of Public and Paper

I need a 4 page evaluation on the controversy of Public and offstage Healthcare in Canada - Research Paper ExampleThe number of bibliographies and citation goes further to prove the viability of the information in the article. The author uses a list of citations to linchpin up his argument on the matter (Chernichovsky, 2000).The article Private health care in Canada saviour or siren? written by Marni D. Brownell and Carolyn A. DeCoster provides opponent arguments on a two-structure health care trunk as influenced by the financial implications and pressures in the nation. In addition, it presents and evaluation of the common beliefs regarding the health care system in Canada. The article is an academic journal published in the Public Health Care Reports in 1997. Considering the fact that this is an academic journal, there are chances that the opinions may be a bit biased and based on personal opinions mostly. There are a number of bibliography and citations to back up the writers arguments. However, the authors mostly reduce on their point of view and do not use any counter arguments, which would have been helpful in persuation (Bromwell, 1997).The third article Financing long term Care in Canada, written by Michael Grignon and Nicole F. Bernier is an empirical study comparing the three different financing schemes for long term care in Canada. The report in a way rather assumes the function of the government in trying to cater to this need for the citizens. The article was published in 2012 after(prenominal) being reviewed by other peers to ensure no bias in the information presented. To support their argument, the authors explain that Canadian Association of Retired Persons (CARP) have since time venerable advocated for aging care which considers the needs of the person and not just financial needs. The authors even go further to use graphs and graphical presentation to try and demo a clear of the information and provide evidence to their argument. The re are no forms of generalizations